2 ms·
Cuneiform math isn't the most terrible. It's 'column' based, like the modern arabic version we have. However, at some times they lacked the 0 representation. R
by Balgair 6y ago
Cuneiform math isn't the most terrible. It's 'column' based, like the modern arabic version we have. However, at some times they lacked the 0 representation.
Roman numerals, however, are quite difficult. In addition to the problems with basic manipulations (27-9, or XXVI - IX), they also lacked any higher symbols than 1000 (M in Roman). So for 15,000 you have to write MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. I'll spare you numbers like 1,000,000.
Here's a good video on how to do math in Cuneiform, and a brief discussion on Roman numerals:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR3zzQP3bII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RR3zzQP3bII
Strangely, Numberphile has yet to do a video on Roman/Chinese number systems. Maybe because it's really hard to do math with them, and that's a bit boring to just show that it's hard.
EDIT: I have been misinformed, Chinese numbers are in fact easy to work with.
- kccqzy 6y agoThe Roman system is indeed difficult? What's difficult about the Chinese one? It seems basically identical to Arabic numerals except using different symbols.