3 ms·
Really cool. One thing the most boring part of my mind is wondering about when seeing these is related to the legality of stuff like that: many of the drone vid
by fab1an 6y ago
Really cool. One thing the most boring part of my mind is wondering about when seeing these is related to the legality of stuff like that: many of the drone videos this is trained on are obviously copyrighted, and the system has used them to learn how to come up with novel ones. The same applies to GPT-n, which is trained on massive amounts of copyrighted material, no?
Does anyone know anything about this; there must be a couple of dissertations on this topic by now?
- mpoteat 6y agoA much more salient and important point is generative models relationship to music. Right now, covers are legally protected as derivative works. I predict commercial usage of generative music to avoid royalties within the next decade. Philosophically, I think that the process of learning - whether by a human or simulacrom - should be protected. That is, if I write a book, I don't need to seek the permission or pay the authors of every book I've ever read. To me, this is the only sane result for a non-dualist materialist who believes neural networks are in principle isomorphic to human minds. As a matter of law, I believe it will have to be determined on the case law level some point. I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.