> In fact, this is the EFF's prime argument for Net Neutrality. [1] As far as I can see, your link does not support your assertion. I think you're completely m

> In fact, this is the EFF's prime argument for Net Neutrality. [1] As far as I can see, your link does not support your assertion. I think you're completely mischaracterizing the primary argument for Net Neutrality. I have never seen anyone assert that without Net Neutrality, speeds would go down or stagnate in general. I have only seen proponents claim that without Net Neutrality, speeds would be selectively reduced or left stagnant. And the burden of proof is very much on you to demonstrate that lifting Net Neutrality regulations is responsible for speeds increasing, and not other factors such as pressure from Google Fiber and declining costs for DOCSIS 3.0 equipment and advances in WiFi that made it possible for most consumers to actually use download speeds in excess of 100Mbps. (Also, we should assess the health of the ISP market a bit more carefully. Increasing download speeds don't tell the whole story. How have the major incumbent ISPs done at increasing upload speeds in recent years. How prevalent are data caps, and are they increasing from year to year?)