> it isn't needed A baseless claim. Others already provided counterexamples. Without net neutrality, things could deteriorate extremely quickly if the changes

> it isn't needed A baseless claim. Others already provided counterexamples. Without net neutrality, things could deteriorate extremely quickly if the changes appeared likely to be profitable. > is just another way for the government to get more control of the internet This statement doesn't even make sense. These aren't KYC regulations or building permits we're talking about here. They just make it illegal to charge for preferential treatment. We've had common carrier laws since forever. The fact that ISPs are exempt is an aberration.