4 ms·
This would be news to me, but it would explain a lot. It always seemed unlikely that Sci-Hub’s archive was entirely contributed by concerned citizens. Phishing
by haram_masala 6y ago
This would be news to me, but it would explain a lot. It always seemed unlikely that Sci-Hub’s archive was entirely contributed by concerned citizens.
Phishing, though, crosses the line. Once you start tricking people and removing their agency, you’re the bad guy.
- monocasa 6y agoI feel like it's more likely someone got caught by their org noticing their credentials being used to dl ridiculous amounts of papers, and fell back on the "wow, that's so weird; I must have been hacked" excuse.
- Vinnl 6y ago> It always seemed unlikely that Sci-Hub’s archive was entirely contributed by concerned citizens. Note that Sci-Hub's model wasn't concerned citizens uploading articles, but academics (allegedly, at least) sharing their credentials and Sci-Hub using those to download requested articles if they didn't have it in their own caches yet. With that method, it seems a lot less unlikely to me that a relatively small number of academics could have "contributed" many articles.