They allow anti-semantic comments from some leaders and censor others over opinions that they don't support but haven't violated any actual reading of the rules

They allow anti-semantic comments from some leaders and censor others over opinions that they don't support but haven't violated any actual reading of the rules. They have demonstrated that they cannot figure this problem out. So, since they cannot do it in an objective or fair way, they should not do it at all. People can follow or not follow. Elected leaders have always been a special case.