4 ms·
That's not entirely true -- there are some applications of the Epoc that can actually perform detections which cannot solely be attributed to facial muscle move
by convulsive 15y ago
That's not entirely true -- there are some applications of the Epoc that can actually perform detections which cannot solely be attributed to facial muscle movement. [1] Of course, the signal-to-noise ratio is much lower than that of research-grade devices, so a lot of preprocessing is required.
[1] NeuroPhone is an example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc82Z_yfEwc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc82Z_yfEwc. Here's a peer-reviewed article describing the preprocessing involved: http://sensorlab.cs.dartmouth.edu/pubs/neurophone.pdf http://sensorlab.cs.dartmouth.edu/pubs/neurophone.pdf
- r0s 15y ago> The Dial Tim application works on similar principles to P300-spellerbrain-computer interfaces: the phone flashes a sequence of photos of contacts from the address book and a P300 neural signal is elicited when the flashed photo matches the person whom the user wishes to dial. This is just as I've said above, one brain signal is used over time.