3 ms·
If it was not obvious: I am deeply sorry that you have to deal with a severe condition. I am just a random internet stranger, but hope for you that treatments t
by JesseMReeves 6y ago
If it was not obvious: I am deeply sorry that you have to deal with a severe condition. I am just a random internet stranger, but hope for you that treatments that will alleviate it can be found soon. Staying on top of the literature will help you.
It is a sensitive personal decision whether you want to know what may happen to you in detail, or not; and nobody should make this decision for someone who is affected by disclosing graphic stories. Most people would therefore be too considerate to pass on such stories, so your friend may be a bit of an „outlier“. That’s all I wanted to say.
- at_a_remove 6y agoNot knowing makes so many more decisions for me, however. Non-disclosure of the reality affects so much. Consider the range of decisions that might be made by one in a state of "blissful ignorance." 1) I consider this the largest: the decision to reproduce or not. First off, it runs the risk of burdening offspring with the exact same condition. Then there is the "can I even manage to raise offspring?" question, at least to the level of the average parent? 2) Similarly, seeking a partner to raise that offspring with. Imagine you had a spouse who had been kept unaware of the situation, and so you were unaware of the situation, and then you were rather suddenly burdened with taking care of someone through a prolonged decline. Would that have seemed fair to you, not to have known? 3) The rest of life planning is almost trivial next to the first couple of issues, but you think about retirement, how one's life is spent given the expected years, and so on. Non-disclosure is a horrifying trap for more than just the patient. I would find someone who would not disclose to be inconsiderate, frankly, similar to in kind, though not in degree, as someone not warning you of a danger in a road you are about to drive down.