The reductum ad absurdum argument for assisted suicide had been decent at converting many skeptics I've talked to: There once was a man who fought in Vietnam w

The reductum ad absurdum argument for assisted suicide had been decent at converting many skeptics I've talked to: There once was a man who fought in Vietnam who was burned by napalm. He had 2nd and 3rd degree burns over almost his entire body, lost both arms, both legs, eyes, ears and most of his mouth. And yet he survived for weeks in agony, a literal hell on earth, typing out "kill me" in morse code with his head. Surely, this person should be allowed to end his life as even people of faith should see this as a worse state than hell. Therefore if this person should be allowed, then we just need to determine where the line is, not if it should be legal or not.