3 ms·
Well, we can all agree that the solution should not be "we'll just require everyone to change all their code through this library" static vs dynamic is a linke
by Luker88 6y ago
Well, we can all agree that the solution should not be "we'll just require everyone to change all their code through this library"
static vs dynamic is a linker (and LTO) problem, we can't start asking everyone everywhere to change all their code.
Although the library does look nice for some use cases
- nicoburns 6y ago> Well, we can all agree that the solution should not be "we'll just require everyone to change all their code through this library" I definitely would like better language support. But IMO the solution shouldn't just be "flip a compiler switch and all your normal data structures have a stable ABI" either. What I would really like to see is a cross-language ABI (that's more fully featured than then C ABI), that can be opted into with `repr(polyabi)` or whatever it ends up being called.