I might be stating the obvious, but want to point out the inherent assumption in your argument that your moral and emotively driven opinions should be enforced

I might be stating the obvious, but want to point out the inherent assumption in your argument that your moral and emotively driven opinions should be enforced against another human being. If you want to optimize for honor in a valiant fight to the end, so be it. But who are you to enforce your morals on someone else, who is making the most personal decision one can ever make for themself?