> Can you define consciousness without invoking subjective conscious experience? You agree there is not evidence of objective existence and yet you say it objec

> Can you define consciousness without invoking subjective conscious experience? You agree there is not evidence of objective existence and yet you say it objectively exists because you subjectively feel it does. Is this not self-contradictory? No, I'm saying it need not be objectively measurable to be real. This is what I mean by empiricism being an incomplete philosophy.