> The A.C.L.U. doesn’t object to Clearview’s scraping of photos, but it says that creating a faceprint from them is “conduct” and not speech — and thus isn’t co

> The A.C.L.U. doesn’t object to Clearview’s scraping of photos, but it says that creating a faceprint from them is “conduct” and not speech — and thus isn’t constitutionally protected. Isn’t the scraping of photos from “public” sources, clearly a copyright violation or at least a terms of service violation? I know that more recently courts have found that aspects of common terms of services aren’t enforceable, but it seems like Clearview’s actions would put the nail in the coffin of believing they were enforceable on any level.