3 ms·
Interesting thought, does using a physical fisheye lens that warps in different way than the eye actually sees the same using a computer-generated fisheye effec
by Rastonbury 6y ago
Interesting thought, does using a physical fisheye lens that warps in different way than the eye actually sees the same using a computer-generated fisheye effect on a source image?
Or any other sort of analog filter/lens that changes the picture for that matter
- strogonoff 6y ago> Does using a physical fisheye lens that warps in different way than the eye actually sees the same using a computer-generated fisheye effect on a source image? I can’t parse this for some reason, could you rephrase? > Or any other sort of analog filter/lens that changes the picture for that matter The glass on the camera affects the shape of the 2D slice of the 3D world captured by the camera and can attenuate light of different frequencies; technically the better you know which equipment was used, the stronger the element of objectivity to raw data captured by camera sensor. Addendum: I take back most of my original comment. Adobe’s super resolution tool operates at the demosaicing stage, so image data it produces is no longer strictly scene-referred (it can’t be both demosaiced and scene-referred). The actual sensor capture is still scene-referred. (I think we’ll see tools that take scene-referred data and output scene-referred data eventually though.)