3 ms·
Rust is pretty stable. The point is that the work on Rust is happening so fast it's getting impossible to keep track of releases whilst making sure that your co
by kaushikt 6y ago
Rust is pretty stable. The point is that the work on Rust is happening so fast it's getting impossible to keep track of releases whilst making sure that your code doesn't go obsolete.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- auggierose 6y agoI think people just have to learn that "not using the newest features of the language" is not a problem. I have no problem with obsolete code, where "obsolete" means just that. I have a problem with broken code. If it ain't broken, no need to fix it.
- tene 6y agoCan you share some examples of Rust code "going obsolete"?
- steveklabnik 6y agoOne thing that makes these sorts of conversations tricky is that different people mean different things when they say stuff like "going obsolete." To some people, it means "this code literally doesn't work anymore," and to other people, it means "oh no the error handling library I use isn't in vogue anymore and I feel the need to re-write everything to use the latest library." There is not a lot of the former, but there is some of the latter, and even if it's self-imposed, some people do feel that pressure.