Just want to leave something here: >the DMCA repeat infringers clause requires that companies terminate relationships with people that repeatedly get DMCA take

Just want to leave something here: >the DMCA repeat infringers clause requires that companies terminate relationships with people that repeatedly get DMCA takedowns. AFAIK there is no clause that protects the reverse process to this: copyright holders can just bulk file bullshit claims without consequences. As usual, it's the big corps that are favored by such laws at the expense of the individual. Also > monetization split exists only for ad-revenue, which is split between YouTube and creators. That doesn't apply to copyright claimed material, where all money goes to the copyright holder, no question asked whatsoever.