> Using the term "open source" without any definition is useless. If we can't agree on a definition, it's impossible to know if we're actually talking about the

> Using the term "open source" without any definition is useless. If we can't agree on a definition, it's impossible to know if we're actually talking about the same thing. Here’s the Cambridge Dictionary’s definition of open source: “Open-source software is free to use, and the original program can be changed by anyone.” Merriam-Webster’s definition: “of software : having the source code freely available for possible modification and redistribution”