3 ms·
Your uncle and aunt are right, it is not for any person to cut their own life short by destroying themselves. It sends out an anti-social message that some amou
by JetAlone 6y ago
Your uncle and aunt are right, it is not for any person to cut their own life short by destroying themselves. It sends out an anti-social message that some amount of suffering or darkness we experience does cause us to consciously choose to annihilate ourselves. It's one thing for an individual to do that and send out this message, but by codifying the act into law, it implicitly further tilts us in the direction that so much suffering should cause us to consciously choose to destroy ourselves.
In aggregate, as a society, we've come to emphasize harm-reduction and a sense of fairness to the point of idolatry. They are valuable in their own right, but alone they will see us cascade into sheer darkness. The values for the sanctity and purity of life, the acceptance of authority outside ourselves, and even the difficult question of ingroup integrity will need to come back into balance.
- nimbleal 6y agoQuite so. The idea of a society based fundamentally on positive freedom is intrinsically oxymoronic
- JetAlone 6y agoIn a way. Where freedom is made fundamental instead of deriving from an even higher fundamental principle it creates a power vacuum, and encourages those who fundamentally value something else to destroy it. Kind of like how we went from almost unilaterally valuing the sanctity of life a generation or two ago (as per the parent comment's aunt and uncle, rest in peace), to here and now, publically discussing the moralilty of destroying yourself.