3 ms·
No, the argument was whether his parents would be in charge of his treatment, or if the state health system could confiscate their kid.
by SamReidHughes 6y ago
No, the argument was whether his parents would be in charge of his treatment, or if the state health system could confiscate their kid.
- DanBC 6y agoMaybe read the court documents before commenting further. "Confiscate"? He was human. He had human rights. He wasn't the property of his parents. He wasn't an object that they could control.