> No, that's not correct. Exactly what are you saying isn't correct? Are you claiming that if google does not proactively take down content, absent any DMCA c

> No, that's not correct. Exactly what are you saying isn't correct? Are you claiming that if google does not proactively take down content, absent any DMCA complaint, they are libel for infringement and do not benefit from S512 limitations on liability? If you are not, how is my statement that this isn't a case of google covering their ass to avoid legal liability (because none exists)?