Similar kind of ambiguity is even in GPLv2. ie. what does "anything that is normally distributed with..." in section 3 mean and how all that interacts with noti

Similar kind of ambiguity is even in GPLv2. ie. what does "anything that is normally distributed with..." in section 3 mean and how all that interacts with notionally GPL licensed software which depends on 3rd party components with GPL-incompatible licenses (on Unix-like systems the issue is typically only with OpenSSL but for GPL licensed Windows-only software this is giant can of worms). What makes SSPL and similar freedom-0 ignoring licenses problematic is that you have to care about these kinds of license ambiguities even if you are just using the software.