2 ms·
> You don't need any training to avoid hitting stationary objects. You do, because you need to correctly conclude that there is going to be a stationary objec
by gpm 6y ago
> You don't need any training to avoid hitting stationary objects.
You do, because you need to correctly conclude that there is going to be a stationary object there with high probability. As it turns out, that's difficult to do perfectly.
- thaumasiotes 6y agoI'm having difficulty following your train of thought. It can be difficult to make conclusions about the future position of mobile objects. It can't be difficult to make conclusions about the current position of stationary objects.
- gpm 6y ago> It can't be difficult to make conclusions about the current position of stationary objects. You need to know that there is a stationary object in the first place, of a kind you care about (not a plastic bag). I.e. that it's not actually a moving object, an optical illusion, etc. You also need to know that you are going to end up moving through it (it's not a parked car that you will avoid by following your lane). That's... not trivial. (going to be was probably poor phrasing on my part, sorry)
- Daho0n 6y agoYet even microcars can do it. Like the Toyota Yaris and VW Up!.
- ClumsyPilot 6y agoYou can determinine a wall accurately without AI, we have for years.