5 ms·
The same could have been said of tobacco in the 50's. Turns out it was bad for you. You're spreading misinformation and could get other people addicted. You're
by TheAdamAndChe 6y ago
The same could have been said of tobacco in the 50's. Turns out it was bad for you.
You're spreading misinformation and could get other people addicted. You're making assumptions on my diet just to dismiss the well-known fact that nicotine is addictive[1]. Most sites that say otherwise are either social media sites like reddit where echo chambers form, or they're obviously pro-ecig and extremely biased.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine
- eurasiantiger 6y agoIn all honesty, it seems your personal experience is clouding your objective judgment. There are plenty of academic studies regarding the matter of MAOIs in tobacco smoke, and their addictiveness. Also, most studies on smoking do not make a difference between smoking and pure nicotine. It would be great if you could check the sources of the Wikipedia article to see if this is the case there.
- TheAdamAndChe 6y agoMy judgement isn't clouded, but I've been directly harmed by such misinformation before. I want other people reading to know that nicotine isn't some wonder nootropic that brings no side effects or addiction, because it's just not the case.
- eurasiantiger 6y agoNobody is making those claims, though.