4 ms·
Most modern mirrorless cameras have such hardware (usually denoted "in-body image stabilization"). The "repurposing" of it to acquire multiple captures at vario
by shock-value 6y ago
Most modern mirrorless cameras have such hardware (usually denoted "in-body image stabilization"). The "repurposing" of it to acquire multiple captures at various slight offsets and combine them intelligently is maybe a bit more recent, but still pretty common at this point.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_stabilization#Sensor-shift https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_stabilization#Sensor-shi...
https://support.d-imaging.sony.co.jp/support/ilc/psms/ilce7rm3/en/index.html https://support.d-imaging.sony.co.jp/support/ilc/psms/ilce7r...
https://www.nikonimgsupport.com/na/NSG_article?articleNo=000042799&configured=1&lang=en_SG https://www.nikonimgsupport.com/na/NSG_article?articleNo=000...
https://www.canon.co.uk/pro/stories/8-stops-image-stabilization/ https://www.canon.co.uk/pro/stories/8-stops-image-stabilizat...
- avereveard 6y agoI think the technique was used a lot prior in astronomy, where I encountered it the first time. There is called stacking, and the subpixel offset comes naturally from path distortion in the atmosphere itself. I remember using registax when the first batch of consumer telezoom point and click camera came out and got a 30x long exposure of the moon, with, well, mediocre results.