3 ms·
How is this different to Gigapixel AI ? https://topazlabs.com/gigapixel-ai/ https://topazlabs.com/gigapixel-ai/
by turrini 6y ago
How is this different to Gigapixel AI ?
https://topazlabs.com/gigapixel-ai/ https://topazlabs.com/gigapixel-ai/
- groby_b 6y agoLooking at results so far, it's strictly better. (Less noisy, less subjective errors on fine detail) If I want to up-rez strictly for printing purposes, the PS one looks like the winner. But, obviously, it's subjective.
- sosuke 6y agoI enjoyed this review https://stephenbayphotography.com/blog/adobe-super-resolution-and-topaz-gigapixel-ai/ https://stephenbayphotography.com/blog/adobe-super-resolutio... Both of the options had winners.
- zokier 6y agoThat is really good comparison, although there might bit of confirmation bias on my part there. For most parts I felt like the improvements are not really worth it compared to the artifacts when it fails. The rusty car texture is maybe the one place where it seemed to really make a distinct improvement.
- kthartic 6y agoDoes it have to be? I think the point is it's built into Adobe products now, which will be fantastic for Photoshop/Lightroom etc users. Unless ofc you're genuinely curious as to how it's different to Gigapixel and not just knocking Adobe :)