2 ms·
This is reminiscent, for me, of the days of unskippable DVD ads and generally terrible DVD/Blu-ray experiences. Downloading a movie would give you a clean file
by joshstrange 6y ago
This is reminiscent, for me, of the days of unskippable DVD ads and generally terrible DVD/Blu-ray experiences. Downloading a movie would give you a clean file with no ads and you could seek wherever without limits but purchasing a legal copy would give you a terrible experience. This kind of DRM and limitations feels so incredibly stupid when you can find high quality 1080p/4K rips of content from every major streaming platforms. So as it stands right now you can bend over backwards to get some support for Widevine to stream low quality OR you can download the full 4K with zero restrictions.
I'm not interested in a discussion on the morality of downloading content, just pointing out how backwards the experience is even when you pay. I'd gladly pay $100+/mo for the experience you can achieve via piracy but it doesn't exist and that's a pretty sad state of things. Spotify(/Amazon/Apple/etc), largely, "solved" piracy by providing a great experience for an affordable price, making it so that it was actually more expensive and more work to pirate music. TV/Movies still doesn't have a spotify-equivalent which sucks.
Even things like Apple TV (The app, not the service or the product, <insert eyeroll emoji>) and Amazon Channels, that both attempt to tackle this problem by unifying multiple "feeds" into 1 app/experience, both fall short and don't have nearly the breadth of content I'd want.