4 ms·
I have no problem with low-res only views of sensitive areas. I don't tend to be staunchly idealistic at the expense of security. So not having high-res satell
by tkahn6 15y ago
I have no problem with low-res only views of sensitive areas. I don't tend to be staunchly idealistic at the expense of security.
So not having high-res satellite imagery of sites in Israel is an affront to your rights, but these aren't?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_map_images_with_missing_or_unclear_data http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_map_images_with_missi...
- kelnos 15y agoNo, those are an affront to my rights as well. Who suggested they weren't?
- tkahn6 15y agoWell as long as you're consistent I don't mind. I imagine it's easy to be self-righteous when it's not your safety on the line. I don't pretend to understand the security concerns of those countries with regards to their facilities.