Going down the route of cherry-picking cases where someone could have lived had they only received medical care, I think the US isn't going to come out great.

Going down the route of cherry-picking cases where someone could have lived had they only received medical care, I think the US isn't going to come out great. Especially given that you've picked an extreme and uncommon case with no assurance whatsoever that the patient would have lived given any treatment anywhere, and which could have killed him purely by being transported; how about if we pick something far more common, like diabetics dying simply because they can't afford insulin?