4 ms·
So, debate as a performance? This makes it much less innovative than it sounds. It was customary for big religions to stage such debates when trying to convert
by gostsamo 6y ago
So, debate as a performance? This makes it much less innovative than it sounds.
It was customary for big religions to stage such debates when trying to convert a pagan society. Check the history of Cyril and Methodius and their khazar mission which is 4-5 hundreds years prier.
- keiferski 6y agoExcept the Mongols weren’t trying to convert anyone, nor was it purely a performance.
- gostsamo 6y agoYes, so the participants in the debates were doing it for what if not to prove their religions? And the audience was their either to bee converted or to enjoy themselves.
- keiferski 6y agoThe Mongols held theological debates, for various reasons. It was a novel thing in that place at the time. Political reasons, cultural reasons, and pure curiosity from Genghis and subsequent leaders. The Mughal (term derived from mongol, although they had a tenuous relationship) leader Akbar did similar things about 300 years later. I recommend reading Genghis Khan and the Quest for God if you want further information. https://www.amazon.com/Genghis-Khan-Quest-God-Conqueror/dp/0735221154 https://www.amazon.com/Genghis-Khan-Quest-God-Conqueror/dp/0...