4 ms·
Expanding recruitment won't be racist by itself, no. But going beyond what company is doing now to hire more _black_ devs would be (they didn't ask where to rec
by mscuwa 6y ago
Expanding recruitment won't be racist by itself, no. But going beyond what company is doing now to hire more _black_ devs would be (they didn't ask where to recruit people, so they probably have enough candidates, the question was "where to recruit black devs if we don't have any black candidates").
- vmception 6y agoits not prejudiced its not harming other groups expanding recruitment efforts to places that include more black developers is not racist by any definition. maybe you aren't reading this the same way, its places that also include more black developers it is not racist by any definition of the word. just because they change a practice does not make it racist, even if their reasoning was as contrived as you think it is, it still would not be racist/prejudiced/exclusionary-to-other-groups when the result is simply expanding efforts to places that also include more black developers
- LudwigNagasena 6y agoWell, if going out of your way to hire people of certain race isn’t racist, this word has clearly lost all its meaning.
- vmception 6y ago1) no definition of that word has ever been that, so once your life long acid trip is over you can join us in this dimension 2) we're talking about expanding recruiting for all races and somehow you still misread that, choosing to focus on the reason that recruiting would be expanded as controversial
- LudwigNagasena 6y ago1) For me it clearly seems like a case of racial bigotry. 2) That’s a very dishonest framing of the issue. And I am not even sure why focusing on the controversial part is used as accusation of something bad ?