3 ms·
I just want to quote because in my opinion your last sentence is right on & bears repeating: "The FTA points out how Microsoft is changing the name of master wi
by kaitai 6y ago
I just want to quote because in my opinion your last sentence is right on & bears repeating: "The FTA points out how Microsoft is changing the name of master with their right hand, but supplying facial recognition software to police to identify protesters and mistake Black folk for Gorillas with their left hand."
On an individual level, I don't find it useful to get too worked up about name changes. Pronouns, names, whatever -- if someone's got a strong feeling I'll use what they want. You know why? (rhetorical HN you, not imbnwa in particular) Talk is cheap. Follow the money, though, the actual money, and supplying crappy facial recognition software that allows mass surveillance and leads to unsupportable arrest of innocent people is $$$. Selling a shitty "AI" program to screen resumes that uses a model that tells you a name like Jared is the best predictor for getting hired is $$$$. Perpetuating inequality through crappy AI/ML design is $$$$, and then noting that it exists and charging to "fix" it is $$$$$! As the beauty and pharma industries know, the best way to make money is to introduce a problem and then introduce a "cure" six months later.
- unreal37 6y agoMicrosoft does not sell it's AI technology to police. So... let's avoid accusing them of things they aren't doing. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/06/11/microsoft-facial-recognition/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/06/11/microso...
- cwkoss 6y agoI wonder if they won't sell their facial recognition technology to vendors that serve the police. Does this policy have teeth or is it just going to induce reseller middle men to sell it police for them?