3 ms·

I guess SO for Teams wasn't very successful then so far.

• macspoofing 6y ago
  There's just so much out there and this is yet another knowledge based system. Also, for smaller teams (say, under 50 people), there probably isn't enough value over a wiki and slack/teams.
• fabian2k 6y ago
  I suspect it is more that they think they figured out how to set the different paid tiers for this. I don't remember the details, but there seem to be more differentiating features for the tiers now than when they started it.
• wisemanwillhear 6y ago
  I was in an organization of 50-100 engineers and we tried several similar systems, but they turned out to be little more than "FAQs" where half the questions were "fake" questions that were preemptively "asked" and answered by the same team. Only on a few rare occasions do I remember multiple people collaborating to address something using the systems. It was rare for an answer or question to get more than 1-2 up votes. There just were not enough people, and people were too busy "doing their job."