> Any reason you couldn't replace "Postgres" with "a database" You could! But you would need ideal concurrency semantics. > I didn't find anything Postgres sp

> Any reason you couldn't replace "Postgres" with "a database" You could! But you would need ideal concurrency semantics. > I didn't find anything Postgres specific other than maybe "SELECT FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED" which you can do without You mean using some equivalent way to achieve "SELECT FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED" ?