3 ms·

Ah I see your point. But an ally asked for something that's rather trivial (for us)... I don't see why we shouldn't comply.

• kelnos 15y ago
  But an ally asked for something that's rather trivial (for us)... I don't see why we shouldn't comply. Because it violates US citizens' first amendment rights?
  • tkahn6 15y ago
    I have no problem with low-res only views of sensitive areas. I don't tend to be staunchly idealistic at the expense of security. So not having high-res satellite imagery of sites in Israel is an affront to your rights, but these aren't? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_map_images_with_missing_or_unclear_data http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_map_images_with_missi...
    • kelnos 15y ago
      No, those are an affront to my rights as well. Who suggested they weren't?
      • tkahn6 15y ago
        Well as long as you're consistent I don't mind. I imagine it's easy to be self-righteous when it's not your safety on the line. I don't pretend to understand the security concerns of those countries with regards to their facilities.