3 ms·
As a Wikipedia contributor and admin (in one country) since early days, I urge everyone to read the original description[0] of this product: > The goal of the
by thatwasunusual 6y ago
As a Wikipedia contributor and admin (in one country) since early days, I urge everyone to read the original description[0] of this product:
> The goal of the project is to build services for large-scale for-profit reusers of Wikimedia content. [...] The focus is on organizations that want to repurpose Wikimedia content in other contexts, providing data services at a large scale, so that they are faster and more comprehensive, reliable, and secure. Wikimedia Enterprise aims to improve the user experience of Wikimedia's readers beyond our own websites; increase the reach and discoverability of the content; and improve awareness and ease of attribution and verifiability by the organizations that reuse Wikimedia content the most—through self-funding services.
This has _nothing_ to do with diverging into a free and a commercial version of Wikipedia. Wikipedia stays the same; Enterprise is just a product built on top of it that anyone can opt to pay for.
This is actually to make it easier for _everyone_ to make use of the Wikipedia data in a better way;
> As this idea developed, it became clear there is a responsibility to democratize our data for organizations that do not possess the resources of these largest users, to ensure we are leveling the playing field and helping to foster a healthy internet without reinforcing monopolies. The benefits of such a service shouldn't just be for startups or alternatives to the internet giants, but also for universities and university researchers; archives and archivists; along with the wider Wikimedia movement.
[0] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Enterprise https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Enterprise
- nindalf 6y agoMost of the comments is just generic slippery slope arguments about how this will ruin Wikipedia in the long run. HN has a way of surfacing such doom and gloom comments while the "seems to be positive, let's wait and watch" wallows at the bottom. If anyone disagrees and is firmly convinced that Wikipedia is going to die because they're offering a way for enterprises to avoid hammering the main site with requests, I'm willing to take a $100 long bet that says otherwise.
- btheshoe 6y agoMaybe you're right, but I still think it's a large jump going from completely non-commercial to partially funded through commercial means. It's a jump that I find concerning
- mPReDiToR 6y agoMaybe having all the "avoid these outcomes" posts at the top is a useful way to checklist the actions? A lot of readers with decent attention spans, or a vested interest will make it to the bottom of the page, probably.