Greenwald is someone who often asks for verifiable proof. Is there real proof or is it people saying there is proof? Can you _link_ the proof he ignores so we c

Greenwald is someone who often asks for verifiable proof. Is there real proof or is it people saying there is proof? Can you _link_ the proof he ignores so we criticize him for ignoring the _verifiably true things_? I have multiple examples of where he seemingly ignores stuff he doesn't want to talk about for one reason or another but that's where I've personally failed in the past. I was very critical of Greenwald for quite some time after championing him for his work with the the Snowden revelations but once someone on Reddit asked me to see if there was actual real proof for the things I thought Greenwald was deliberately ignoring, I understood a bit more what he's about. I think many people are so used to having the media cheer for "their team" while criticizing "the other team" 100% of the time that they completely forgot what journalism is supposed to be.