5 ms·

> Not sure why this isn't higher up. This is crucial information showing this is FUD. It's already too high up given it's a blatantly baseless accusation. I'm

> Not sure why this isn't higher up. This is crucial information showing this is FUD. It's already too high up given it's a blatantly baseless accusation. I'm confused why you think it's more credible than the article when it provides zero evidence.

wealthyyy 6y ago
Both articles provides zero evidence other than concept of attack in general and all of them just claiming that mobile numbers can be hacked.
meowface 6y ago
True. Evidence one way or the other is needed.