>>If that's the case, you could have led with them. Why not lead with them? Because I'd need to provide multiple citations, and I felt that was overkill for a

>>If that's the case, you could have led with them. Why not lead with them? Because I'd need to provide multiple citations, and I felt that was overkill for a starter comment in an informal discussion. I thought if someone disputed the claims in the succinct video I provided, I could then provide a more academic-style comment with the sources you mention. Calling it mindless - not to mention 'spam' despite it being completely ontopic, just because you disagree with the veracity of the arguments - instead of just asking for more objective sources, is belligerent to the point of being unconstructive.