3 ms·
Hey! You are right about newbies ignoring what the HN was initially created for. I agree, my bad but to my excuse 3 outher submittions I made were pretty much a
by dennisbalon 6y ago
Hey! You are right about newbies ignoring what the HN was initially created for. I agree, my bad but to my excuse 3 outher submittions I made were pretty much according to the HN standards I believe.
Thanks for such a thought thorugh reply, the point about comments exactly something I wanted to hear.
I agree, HN much more feels like a silent resource of knowledge and knowledgable point of views. WHen reading FB I rarely even open comments myself.
And I agree there are way to many goody-positive as you said sites with pure flood instead of highly valueable on average posts.
Thanks again for your reply. I value your time a lot.
- ksaj 6y agoI like to say FB comments are for grandma to tell grandkid how cute they looked in that tie at the pre-Covid family reunion. I haven't logged in for a decade, so I don't even know what people do on FB now that you can't really take pictures of your restaurant entrée every day anymore. > pure flood Very good term for it. I even like it when people disagree here, since they typically back it up with reason. It's not a stoic site - it's just not flippant either. There should be a web forum Kinsey Scale for that.
- dennisbalon 6y agoDisagreeing is cleraly valuable for some but rather hard to accept for “FB commenter” types. Thanks again for your time!