> Otherwise, about the article, it's unfair to say that we need to correct the AI/ML to a more "neutral" perspective. I work in ML. its not neutrality, its rep

> Otherwise, about the article, it's unfair to say that we need to correct the AI/ML to a more "neutral" perspective. I work in ML. its not neutrality, its representation. if you use your own staff to train a face detector, a detector to detect small faces in CCTV, it'll only work on your staff. It won't pick up children, anybody who is slightly brown, anyone with big hair, or people who wear hats. thats rubbish if you expect your models to work in the wider world. don't think of is as political, think of it as trying to release a word processor to the world that only support ANSII, and wondering why its not selling overseas.