3 ms·
This requires him to be aware of each pattern/“bias” in the data, which he isn’t, which is the reason we use the algos in the first place. Come to think of it,
by hans1729 6y ago
This requires him to be aware of each pattern/“bias” in the data, which he isn’t, which is the reason we use the algos in the first place.
Come to think of it, isn’t that an interesting venue for GAN-esque methods to detect the relation of patterns falling into these categories of biases? Or is that recursive problem? If not, put me in the paper :-)
- cbsmith 6y ago> This requires him to be aware of each pattern/“bias” in the data, which he isn’t, which is the reason we use the algos in the first place. That's not strictly true. In a lot of cases you start out oblivious to biases in the data, and then when you evaluate the model you notice problems. But your point about obliviousness to bias is exactly what I'm speaking towards. One might be oblivious to bias that aligns with your own biases, but notice bias that conflicts with it.
- adjkant 6y agoI can't tell if watching the switch from they to he pronouns in a post about bias awareness is making me side more with or against your point :)
- hans1729 6y agoLets just say I made the consicious descision to go with the masculine form :-)