3 ms·
There are sooo many nice language features that have proven themselves over the last 3-4 decades and have become popular but are missing from Go that I think ar
by bosswipe 6y ago
There are sooo many nice language features that have proven themselves over the last 3-4 decades and have become popular but are missing from Go that I think archaic is appropriate.
- andrewstuart2 6y agoThere's archaic and there's minimalist, and they're definitely not the same. Languages with buckets of features have steeper and longer learning curves, and if they're still actively developed, what you do learn may not last long. Go is what I'd call minimalist. COBOL or fortran are what I'd call archaic.