3 ms·
You're assuming "the most interesting parts" are from original documents and not doctored. There are many interests that create anti-vax campaigns, much of it c
by devwastaken 6y ago
You're assuming "the most interesting parts" are from original documents and not doctored. There are many interests that create anti-vax campaigns, much of it coming from singular sources and brought to you by bots. Meaning somebody is making money or political power from it.
https://www.dailydot.com/debug/facebook-anti-vax-influencers/ https://www.dailydot.com/debug/facebook-anti-vax-influencers...
If there's actual proof the PP video was legitimate surely it's in that criminal case. Provide specific and high quality proof on specific instances, making wide generalizations does not make it convincing.
- jtbayly 6y agoThe case was for breaking the law to get the information. It didn’t matter that it was accurate and the public should know what was happening.
- devwastaken 6y agoWhich will show what kind of actions they did or did not actually go through. Are you basing the proof of pp selling parts soley based on an edited video?
- jtbayly 6y agoNo it won't, and no I'm not. Did you bother to look into this at all or are you just repeating talking points?