>One of the best ways of winning market share is to bid low, and then if demand is high, to simply not deliver to Commercial customers Is there a contradiction

>One of the best ways of winning market share is to bid low, and then if demand is high, to simply not deliver to Commercial customers Is there a contradiction between talking about the problem of an impending monopoly or duopoly and the problems currently caused by competition? Could the consolidation be nature's way of solving the race to the bottom? Why not?