4 ms·
From https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/cyberattack-ema-update-6 https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/cyberattack-ema-update-6 the EMA has acknowledge that the indi
by pjo90 6y ago
From https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/cyberattack-ema-update-6 https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/cyberattack-ema-update-6 the EMA has acknowledge that the individual emails are authentic, though "data from different users were selected and aggregated, screenshots from multiple folders and mailboxes have been created and additional titles were added by the perpetrators in a way which could undermine trust in vaccines."
- luxuryballs 6y agosounds like an excuse, it’s a little creepy that certain parties have such a stake in vaccines being extremely trustworthy, as if there’s something wrong with it being a different case per each individual’s health/risk status, they should be saying “talk to your doctor” rather than “everyone get the vaccine when it’s your turn”
- jdavis703 6y agoWhat more information could a doctor have that the drug regulators lack?
- luxuryballs 6y agoInformation about your personal health, history, medications, and risk factors of course.
- jdavis703 6y agoA patient’s medical record isn’t useful when the only groups being advised not to take vaccines are children and people with past allergic reactions to vaccines. A doctor has no more information in this regard than the health regulators.
- luxuryballs 6y agoJust like everything in medicine it’s all risk management. If the risk of suffering damage from covid is lower than the risk of damage from a vaccine then you don’t need the vaccine. A doctor will know your proper risk assessment.