>Google's developer guidelines prohibit apps "that contain or promote ... any content or services intended to be sexually gratifying." Very reminiscent of the

>Google's developer guidelines prohibit apps "that contain or promote ... any content or services intended to be sexually gratifying." Very reminiscent of the language of the US Comstock Laws which started 148 years ago. One hundred and two years ago, a judge called those laws "haphazard and capricious". Those words seem to fit in this case. And this is not the Victorian Era. I imagine Google would rather not be called to D.C. again to explain its behavior to a Congress that is unwilling to explicitly define it's expectations.