3 ms·
While I find the idea of many micro-communities compelling, I don't think that this is the direction things are going. Here's why: the Internet is extremely di
by danielrhodes 15y ago
While I find the idea of many micro-communities compelling, I don't think that this is the direction things are going.
Here's why: the Internet is extremely diverse as it is and overall makes for a bad user experience where people have to cognitively deal with many different (and disagreeing) interfaces, rules, quirks, web addresses, and so on. At the beginning this heterogeneity was seen as an advantage because the amount of easily accessible information was unparalleled. However, in the past few years it seems like most successful platforms (be it YouTube, Facebook, Tumblr, Amazon, Wikipedia, iOS, etc.) have done well because there was a consistent and one-stop shop experience throughout.
There is still tons of room on many different verticals to improve and disruption to occur, but I wouldn't expect things to come full circle.
- icebraining 15y agoWell, there's Reddit and its collection of small communities under the same banner. But I think as more and more CMSs start introducing semantic information in their HTML, we'll start to have more client side features that work across all such websites, and eventually we'll go full circle and reinvent USENET, but now with a dozen layers of abstraction to support it.
- pnathan 15y agoWhen you are shopping, you want a trusted second party. E.g., Amazon. While Wikipedia is cool, it still doesn't beat the enthusiast's homepage. And Facebook has never had the personality of GeoCities.