Thank you for the list, I will do a little poking around just for our conversation 8 months from now. ;) The very first publication I found in 2 minutes follow

Thank you for the list, I will do a little poking around just for our conversation 8 months from now. ;) The very first publication I found in 2 minutes following links randomly, from the starting place you provided says: “Repeatedly, [Social Jet Lag] has been found to be a risk factor for higher body mass index (BMI) or even obesity, depressive symptoms, and for behaviour that is hazardous to health, such as smoking and poor dietary habits (for a review see [15]). The effects found by Borisenkov et al. (2017) [14] correspond to a statistically small to medium effect size (r = 0.2). Roenneberg, Winnebeck, et al. [8] however recently claimed that this effect was “biologically large”. While that may be true, such a claim is unjustified so long as we lack information about the practical meaningfulness of differences in SJL on an interval scale” [1] (emphasis mine) This is exactly what I’ve been saying. The health claims of DST are being exaggerated. I don’t have any problem with their conclusion that perennial Standard Time seems to have “higher” support than perennial Daylight Savings, based on the available and indirect evidence, but SRBR and others calling it conclusive and “strong” is not something that either the science nor most scientists agree with. Your claim that there’s strong consensus isn’t true. [1] https://www.mdpi.com/2624-5175/2/1/3/htm https://www.mdpi.com/2624-5175/2/1/3/htm