Well if it's true, then they were trying to put flawed code into freebsd which they would then ship to customers in their security product. They're not some ra

Well if it's true, then they were trying to put flawed code into freebsd which they would then ship to customers in their security product. They're not some random person but are representing their company with their code. If there was a security exploit with their Wireguard implementation, would Netgate get blamed or Wireguard?