5 ms·
That's why I thought. Why would you say that is? He's obviously educated and speaks with "facts" that have "references", but it just feels like the left does no
by MuffinFlavored 6y ago
That's why I thought. Why would you say that is? He's obviously educated and speaks with "facts" that have "references", but it just feels like the left does not like his facts/does not agree with the same conclusion his references reach.
I'm not big into politics but I don't really understand how two different parties can both use "science and data" to reach totally separate conclusions. Which one is lying/wrong?
As a programmer, it just doesn't compute. Input and output and all that.
- chmod600 6y agoPolitics is informed by data, but it's not a science. There is no "right" answer (though arguably a lot of wrong ones). Think of stuff that programmers do argue about. Type systems, databases, architecture, agile development, etc. Logic is a great tool, but it's also more limited than people realize.